Table: Senioren 50+ [Gruppe A] - 2009/2010 (Limit rounds)

Rank Rank Points -> match ratio -> number of match won -> game ratio.	Team	T-Abbr.	M Team matches (M) Number of team matches.	W Win (W) Number of wins of the team	D Draw (D) Number of draws of the team	L Loss (L) Number of losses of the team	MR Match ratio (MR) Ratio: won single and double match / lost single and double match			GR Game ratio (GR) Ratio: won games / lost games			P Points (P) Number of points: Win: 2 points Draw: 1 points Loss: 0 points No line up: 0 points
1.	Pottenbrunn 1	POTT1	5	5	0	0	15	:	2	47	:	14	10
2.	Wörth 1	WÖRT1	5	4	0	1	13	:	4	43	:	17	8
3.	Langenlois 1	LALO1	5	3	0	2	11	:	6	38	:	21	6
4.	Wieselburg 1	WIES1	5	2	0	3	6	:	9	21	:	29	4
5.	Waidhofen/Thaya 1	WAIT1	5	1	0	4	3	:	13	11	:	41	2
6.	Langenlois 2	LALO2	5	0	0	5	1	:	15	7	:	45	0

Single Ranking Senioren 50+ [Gruppe A] - 2009/2010

Rank Rank Only players having played at least half of the matches are ranked. Players without losses are ranked before players with losses. Within those players a higher product of MW is better. Players having at least one loss are ranked by the term MW/L.	Name	Passnr.	T-Abbr.	M Team matches (M) Number of team matches.	W / L Wins / Losses (W / L) Ratio: Wins / Losses from single matches. Pay attention for extra rules for players without any win or without any loss (see Rank).			RC-Rating RC-Rating Ratings Central rating ± standard deviation (uncertainty). For ongoing season: current values. For former seasons: values at the end of season			AG Age-Group (AG) Age-Groups are defined by key date U 9: under 9 (-1 last U9-year, -2 year before last U9-year, ...) U11: under 11 (1 first U11-year, 2 second U11-year) U13: under 13 (1 first U13-year, 2 second U13-year) U15: under 15 (1 first U15-year, 2 second U15-year) U18: under 18 (1 first U18-year, 2 second U18-year, 3 third U18-year) U21: under 21 (1 first U21-year, 2 second U21-year, 3 third U21-year) S40: Seniors over 40 years S50: Seniors over 50 years S60: Seniors over 60 years S70: Seniors over 70 years S80: Seniors over 80 years.
1.	Göls Horst	5886	POTT1	5	7	:	0	1838	±	42	S50
2.	Sonnleitner Friedrich	3025	WÖRT1	5	6	:	1	1835	±	44	S50
3.	Nagl Wolfgang	4594	LALO1	5	4	:	2	1668	±	49	S50
4.	Berger Manfred	5377	WÖRT1	5	3	:	2	1615	±	45	S50
4.	Voller Johann	6559	POTT1	5	3	:	2	1675	±	46	S50
6.	Bürscher Robert	11606	WIES1	5	2	:	3	1181	±	52	S50
6.	Steinhammer Wolfgang	10102	WIES1	5	2	:	3	1522	±	62	S50
8.	Grohmann Hans Peter	3785	LALO1	3	2	:	2	1671	±	53	S60
9.	Streicher Gerhard	5986	WAIT1	5	2	:	4	1115	±	59	S50
10.	Haimböck Franz	8488	LALO2	5	1	:	5	971	±	49	S60
11.	Faux Peter	9728	LALO2	5	0	:	5	1014	±	63	S50
11.	Pomalis Jan	11835	WAIT1	5	0	:	5	897	±	70	S50
Not ranked: Not ranked Players that have played in less than 50% of possible team matches are not ranked.
	Birringer Gerhard	7314	LALO1	2	2	:	0	1544	±	66	S50

Double Ranking: Senioren 50+ [Gruppe A] - 2009/2010

Rank

T-Abbr.

Team matches (M)

Number of team matches.

Wins / Losses (W / L)

Match-Ratio: Won double matches / Lost double matches

Games

Game-Ration: Won games / Lost games (double)

Pair-Results

Player-Results

1.

POTT1

5

5

:

0

15

:

2

Voller Joh. / Göls Hor.

5:0

Voller Johann	5:0
Göls Horst	5:0

2.

WÖRT1

5

4

:

1

13

:

4

Berger Man. / Sonnleitner Fri.

4:1

Berger Manfred	4:1
Sonnleitner Friedrich	4:1

3.

LALO1

5

3

:

2

10

:

6

Birringer Ger. / Nagl Wol.	2:0
Grohmann Han. / Nagl Wol.	1:2

Birringer Gerhard	2:0
Nagl Wolfgang	3:2
Grohmann Hans Peter	1:2

4.

WIES1

5

2

:

3

6

:

9

Bürscher Rob. / Steinhammer Wol.

2:3

Bürscher Robert	2:3
Steinhammer Wolfgang	2:3

5.

WAIT1

5

1

:

4

4

:

12

Streicher Ger. / Pomalis Jan.

1:4

Streicher Gerhard	1:4
Pomalis Jan	1:4

6.

LALO2

5

0

:

5

0

:

15

Faux Pet. / Haimböck Fra.

0:5

Faux Peter	0:5
Haimböck Franz	0:5

XTTV Result Service (Version 15.1329 - 26.08.2023) | XTTV | NÖTTV-contact | Privacy Policy